Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Middle East Free Essays

This narrative proved to be overblown and ultimately the clash of civilizations thesis has been discarded. However, a decade on, the fast-paced events of the Arab Spring have once again revived the question as to whether we are witnessing a clash of collocations Does the Arab Spring reflect a clash of civilizations On the face of it, the Arab Spring appeared to be heading into clash of civilizations territory as Western-backed dictators fell like nine pins, and the revolts appeared to be pre)-lilacs, anti-Western and anti-liberal. Recently, a violent string of protests across the middle east against a us-made film, which was held to denigrate the prophet Mohamed, culminated in a deadly arson attack that killed the US ambassador to Libya. We will write a custom essay sample on Middle East or any similar topic only for you Order Now Once again, some commentators have framed these events as a clash of cultures and a pivotal moment in Western and Islamic relations. However, the evidence suggests that the clash of civilizations thesis is exaggerated. So in relation to the Arab Spring, it is more helpful to see it as a clash between people and governments within the Arab world, caused in large part by incompetent governance and an inability to listen to what the people want. Contrary to the clash argument, the Arab Spring is not a clash between Islamic radicalism and the west. Looking closely at the region reveals that each upheaval has Its specific characteristics, each country its own history and ethnic mix. In Bahrain, for example, the Arab Spring has manifested itself in an explosion of long-held tensions between Sunnis and Shih Muslims. There Is some interesting polling that popular concerns about democracy In Bahrain have decreased since the start of the troubles, while encores about Iran have increased. In Egypt, people simply wanted a change Embark was self-evidently time-expired and the longer the military try to hold on to power (prompted in part by their large stake in the economy), the lower their popular support becomes. Similar, although more extreme, concerns apply In Libya, exacerbated by the tribal nature of Libyan society (a really big determinant). Its also instructive to note what is happening in Tunisia, which seems to be providing a very Arab/North African take on democracy but which seems to be working nonetheless. So In essence, the Arab Spring Is not really clash of civilizations territory at all. The role of Islam in the Arab Spring Jane Simonton, Chatham Houses middle east expert, comments in relation to Tunisia and Egypt that The vague, catch-all term Salamis belies the diversity of movements that seek to draw inspiration, values and legitimacy from Islam. There are enormous differences In thinking both between different Salamis groups, and wealth them. Crucially, this diversity Is likely to Increase as a result of the new-found political opening in the Arab world. Salamis movements OFF uprisings in Egypt and Tunisia succeeded precisely because they avoided the divisions of ideology, class and, in Egypt, religion that have traditionally fractured and weakened opposition movements in the Arab world. Certainly Salamis movements were more successful than any other parties in the recent parliamentary elections in Egypt and Tunisia, prompting some observers to accuse them of stealing the revolutions. The protests that drove political changes in 2011 hoisted slogans with universal appeal calling for freedom, dignity, social Justice more than they referred specifically Islamic slogans. They were not Salamis, anti-legalist or non- Salamis protests Psalmists participated alongside secularists, liberals and leftists and there were striking images of Muslims and Christians guarding each others prayers in Their Square. Neither Salamis movements nor other existing political parties can claim credit for these youth-led, spontaneously swelling street movements. Thus, what we are seeing is far from the rise of a monolithic civilizations identity, but rather an intra-civilizations splintering over political and economic ideas. Conclusion clash within the Arab world The Arab Spring is not so much to be seen as a clash of civilizations but rather a power struggle motivated by pollarded sectarian differences within Arab countries. TTY McCormick in the Huffing Post argues It is clear that a clash within civilizations helps to explain the Arab Spring more than a clash between them. William Misacts writing in the Journal, Foreign Affair, also questions the clash of civilizations thesis On 9/1 1, the global Jihads movement burst into the worlds consciousness, but a decade later, thanks in part to the Arab Spring and the killing of Osama bin Laden, it is in crisis. With Western-backed dictators falling, al Qaeda might seem closer than ever to its goal of building Islamic states. But the revolutions have empowered the groups chief rivals instead Salamis parliamentarians, who are willing to use ballots, not bombs. Activities (1) Follow on discussion To what extent is does the Arab Spring constitute a clash of civilizations Given that this topic is in many ways Just a footnote to the wider debate over the clash of civilizations thesis, it might be worth asking groups to draw up precise lists of points both for and against this action. (2) Arab Spring mint-presentations allocate members of the class to one of the Arab Spring countries (Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Bahrain, Syria etc. ) and ask them to do a one-slide presentation outlining key events etc. How to cite Middle East, Papers Middle East Free Essays This Muslim extremist group has be-headed three International Journalist, two of them being United States citizens. They are looking to militaries radical Islamic followers and re-establish a radical Muslim rule In Iraq and Syria. Recently an allied international force, headed by the united States, has joined forces to stop ISIS from growing and gaining a stronger foothold in the Middle East. We will write a custom essay sample on Middle East or any similar topic only for you Order Now The recent international action taken against ISIS has made me think that we may be entering into a new war against radical extremists. Obama was quoted recently in a press conference saying, â€Å"We will hunt down terrorists who threaten our country, wherever they are. That means I will not hesitate to take action against SILL in Syria, as well as Iraq,† Obama said in a recent press conference. NATO and the UN have joined forces along with many countries throughout the world to stop the spread of this terror group. I think the recent airstrip’s throughout the region are pushing ISIS to retreat but, I also believe that a stronger ground defense should be utilized to deter further advancements by ISIS throughout Syria and Iraq. Recently, France has launched several airstrip’s on high-value ISIS targets and they were successful. However, it is hard to combat this force because they are very illusive and know the regions very well. I think that â€Å"boots on the ground† will be the most successful way in combating this group because we can bring the fight directly to them, instead of operating strictly from the air, launching our attacks from our fighter Jets. Having military personnel on the ground is crucial in deterring and stopping SIS’S. The United States next move in fighting this terror group, in my opinion should be to send American soldiers and other military groups to fight on the ground. Ultimately, I think this fight will come down to the presidential order by President Obama. He Is currently In the process of asking Congress to extend our military rights to fight this roof. I hope that Obama will use his power to take this fight from the skies and bring It to the enemy’s front door; on the ground. Middle East By neighborhoods Currently the biggest problem in the Middle East is the Islamic State in Syria and international Journalist, two of them being United States citizens. They are looking to militaries radical Islamic followers and re-establish a radical Muslim rule in Iraq and Syria. Recently an allied international force, headed by the United States, has Joined operating strictly from the air, launching our attacks from our fighter Jets. Having military personnel on the ground is crucial in deterring and stopping ISIS. The United States next move in fighting this terror group, in my opinion should be to send American soldiers and other military groups to fight on the ground. Ultimately, I think this fight will come down to the presidential order by President Obama. He is currently in the process of asking Congress to extend our military rights to fight this bring it to the enemy’s front door; on the ground. How to cite Middle East, Papers

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.